I remember automated application testing vendors swearing that manual QA would be going away. That particular conversation...
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
has happened over the course of 20 years.
Automated application testing has been at the forefront of the testing discussion for ages, but manual QA is still alive and well. Automation is still a work in progress, as early tools only worked on relatively simple applications. I don't know about you, but how often do customers need, use or want a simple application? Granted, I do use the calculator tool, but I wouldn't purchase an automation tool for it.
Another reason automated application testing development isn't as strong as you'd think it'd be by now is because it frequently fails to deliver value. It doesn't find significant defects and it's usually abandoned due to the high cost of maintenance.
That's not to say it can't be successful. It can, but only if it's planned on the basis of realistic expectations and factual data. There's no replacement for facts. The reality is it's going to take time to plan out which test cases, in what areas, to automate and in what priority order. Gathering input from developers and testers is essential to come up with a test automation plan that is realistic and maintainable. It's also important to do test runs and verify that the automation path you've chosen works for both the simple and complex application functions.
You may consider doing a pilot project on a mix of functional test cases that broadly cover the application. Determine which areas of the application cause trouble or where your scripts are running into problems. Run the pilot for a decent amount of time to detect any maintainability issues over a period of three to six months. It's better to find out earlier than later in the event that replanning or significant adjustments are needed.
Automated application testing development is viable when planned with realistic goals based on fact. I don't believe manual testing is replaceable, but I also believe automation has value when done appropriately.
We have automated dinosaurs but what about automated testing?
Today's top automated functional testing tools
Is test data management a better career choice than test automation?
Dig Deeper on Automated Software Testing
Related Q&A from Amy Reichert
QA needs to keep reminding business of its value. Expert Amy Reichert offers tried-and-true advice on how to leverage documentation and automation to...continue reading
Contract QA jobs can pay more than staff positions, but only if you're a good negotiator. Expert Amy Reichert helps explain the differences between ...continue reading
Quality assurance professionals need to start thinking about bringing business along for the ride. Expert Amy Reichert offers tried-and-true advice ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.