When two other team members (perhaps a tester and a developer, for example) aren't getting along, how can a project...
By submitting your email address, you agree to receive emails regarding relevant topic offers from TechTarget and its partners. You can withdraw your consent at any time. Contact TechTarget at 275 Grove Street, Newton, MA.
manager handle the situation to keep the project on track?
When there is team conflict, especially when two team members seem like they are continually disagreeing and butting heads, it's usually because they have conflicting priorities. Although everyone on the project team should have the same goal, team members may fundamentally disagree on the best approach to accomplish that goal. In general, getting the project back on track requires the project manager to get the fighting parties to focus on their common ground and move toward a mutually beneficial understanding.
The team's goal should be to complete the project on schedule, within budget and with a high degree of quality. Each team member will generally embrace one element of this triple constraint (time, cost or scope) more than the others. What is most important to each team member usually comes from their respective roles and responsibilities on the project. For example, a developer or business-systems analyst may place a lot of importance on keeping the scope on track, whereas a tester may be more concerned about the quality of the delivery.
When team conflict threatens to steer the project off-course, the project manager needs to analyze the root cause in order to understand what each team member considers most important.
A project manager who takes the time to understand the needs, values and priorities of each team member will understand the root cause of the clash, and he or she will be better equipped to deal with the issue. Then the project manager can meet individually with the team members who are fighting to help them understand each other's point of view. If the conflict is more pervasive among the team members, a team meeting during which each member offers his or her point of view may be a better approach.
In conclusion, in order to avoid refereeing a team conflict, the project manager should seek to understand the root of the conflict and then help each team member see the other's point of view.
Defining project management
Project management lessons learned shouldn't be limited to postmortems
How to deal with workplace conflict
Learn how to select the right ALM software for your organization
Dig Deeper on Building Software Project Teams
Gerie Owen asks:
How have you resolved conflict on your teams? What has worked, and what has not?
1 ResponseJoin the Discussion
Related Q&A from Gerie Owen
How do you determine which test case management tools are the best fit for your organization? Expert Gerie Owen explains why you should start by ...continue reading
Taking on the role of a QA lead for the first time can be daunting. How does it differ from other roles? What does the job entail? Expert Gerie Owen ...continue reading
Both young and experienced testers should be adaptable, but what else do young testers need to know? Gerie Owen offers tips on how veterans can lead ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.