Q

Key players to consider when comparing cloud providers

Cloud providers offer the same basic service. However, different providers cater to different customers.

What are the differences between Rackspace, Google Cloud Platform and Amazon Web Services? Are there other key...

players I don't know about? Where do they fit in?

 When comparing cloud providers, you will want to examine the benefits, limitations and any bonus items each service provider offers.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) has a full suite of offerings and is one of the oldest and most popular platforms out there. Their services include compute and storage with Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) and Simple Storage Service (S3). One of the most important features AWS offers is a robust set of services and monitoring tools, and pricing that can meet the needs of all business sizes.

Amazon is one of the foremost innovators in cloud services and continues to address market demands. I recommend starting with EC2 and S3 if you are looking to migrate or build a business with Amazon.  

Google provides Google Compute Engine and data storage services. However, the current Google offering has limited features compared to other service providers such as AWS. Google is best for high-performance computing or other analytical applications, but if you are looking to load balance across multiple servers, then Google Compute Engine would not be the best option.

Rackspace provides both computing and storage services. They will host databases and provide file storage over the network. One benefit to Rackspace is that a customer can choose from public, private or even hybrid cloud services.

Overall, the easiest cloud providers to use and deploy are AWS and Rackspace.

With Rackspace, a customer can easily create remote monitoring and management.

Additional options include Microsoft Azure, an easy-to-use infrastructure as a service (IaaS) platform that can run Linux virtual machines as well as Windows instances. It is similar to other service providers out there, but there are limitations because it still is a Microsoft platform.

IBM and HP each provide their own IaaS offerings as well. IBM's Smart Cloud and HP's Converged Infrastructure both cater more toward enterprise customers. Both are hybrid solutions and best for development teams who want to integrate their existing IT infrastructure with cloud. Both IBM and HP are new in the IaaS space. If you currently are not an IBM customer, this IaaS solution might not be the best choice.

Overall, the easiest cloud providers to use and deploy are AWS and Rackspace. They cater to multiple business structures -- from small and medium-sized businesses to enterprise customers. They have a track record of innovation and offer a complex assortment of services.

Next Steps

Making cloud-to-cloud integration strategy, tools decisions

Public or private? Picking your hybrid cloud strategy's starting point

This was last published in July 2014

Dig Deeper on Cloud ALM

PRO+

Content

Find more PRO+ content and other member only offers, here.

Have a question for an expert?

Please add a title for your question

Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.

You will be able to add details on the next page.

Join the conversation

1 comment

Send me notifications when other members comment.

By submitting you agree to receive email from TechTarget and its partners. If you reside outside of the United States, you consent to having your personal data transferred to and processed in the United States. Privacy

Please create a username to comment.

What cloud provider do you use, and how did you choose it?
Cancel

-ADS BY GOOGLE

SearchSOA

TheServerSide

SearchCloudApplications

SearchAWS

SearchBusinessAnalytics

SearchFinancialApplications

SearchHealthIT

Close