There are pros and cons to both approaches. If the test group is expected to perform quality assurance activities...
By submitting your personal information, you agree that TechTarget and its partners may contact you regarding relevant content, products and special offers.
-- those activities that monitor the software development processes -- it might be better to have a centralized team.
Centralization allows for the team to set organizational standards, ensure consistency in processes, share tools and best practices and impose some autonomy to the quality efforts. Often when testing and QA are part of the development team, delivery schedules trump quality.
On the other hand, it is very important for the test engineers to have a close relationship with the developers and intimate knowledge of the application under test. When the team is part of the same organization there is often better communication and testers are involved earlier in the development cycle, often working side-by-side with developers, leading to quicker bug detection and a higher quality product.
My opinion would be keep QA activities and personnel centralized, but to pair testers with developers early in the software development cycle. If the QA and test team are the same team, then organizationally I would suggest a centralized QA team, with testers having a dotted-line reporting relationship with the development team. In essence, the tester would have two teams – the QA team and the project team.
Regardless of model, the key is strong communication and collaboration between development and test. If the test team is separated organizationally or geographically from the development team, this will be more of a challenge, but given the appropriate attention, it can definitely be accomplished.
Dig Deeper on Software Project Management Process
Related Q&A from Yvette Francino
Agile mobile development can be made easier by using a little-known methodology, called Mobile-D. Expert Yvette Francino takes us inside this process.continue reading
It may be challenging to make sure everyone's voice is heard in collaborative meetings, but a good facilitator can ensure this happens.continue reading
Agile methodologies stress the benefits of collaboration, working with cross-functional teams to encourage communication between business owners and ...continue reading
Have a question for an expert?
Please add a title for your question
Get answers from a TechTarget expert on whatever's puzzling you.