 |
|
|
| > |
QUESTION POSED ON: 26 April 2007
One of the members of my team has done an outstanding job on our project. She hasn't been a stellar performer in the past, and the results she's achieved lately have been the result of a conscious effort to improve her focus and attention to detail. I want to recognize her contributions in a way that is effective, without bringing public attention to the fact that this is an improvement from sub-standard performance. Do you have any suggestions for good ways to do this?
|
|
| > |
Whatever you do, don't mention anything about past performance publicly. This may seem obvious to the point of stupidity, but I've seen it done. Never embarrass someone because they did a good job.
I think the most effective recognition is sincere appreciation. Whether it's done publicly or privately is not as important as whether you actually mean it. Make sure you do mean it before you open your mouth. And then just tell the truth: that you appreciate what the person has done and what it has meant to the success of the project. It's not rocket science, and it doesn't have to be eloquent. Just say thank you.
One of the key ingredients in expressing sincere appreciation is timing. I prefer to wait for an opportune moment to express my gratitude rather than seeking them out especially for the reason of thanking them. This works only if you have regular interactions with the person. If you don't, you will probably have to arrange something more formal. I like the casual approach because it feels more natural and less awkward. It also helps you avoid the pressure of congratulating them in a public setting, which can be stressful for you and can inspire jealousy in others.
Finally, get a budget for recognition and use it. Words are nice, but T-shirts, mugs, gift certificates, and other swag are better. Put your money where your mouth is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Search and Browse the Expert Answer Center
Search and browse more than 25,000 question and
answer pairs from more than 250 TechTarget industry experts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
